Qwen3.8 27B

Alibaba

This model reads its records accurately. The totals and refund amounts it quotes match its lookups, and it corrects a customer who gets a price wrong.

It's weaker when it acts. It tends to put a return through after telling the customer why it shouldn't, and it gives out another account's email. It also makes up details it doesn't have. It scores 82 on quality, its median reply takes 5.1 seconds, and a conversation costs $0.024.

Running it

Median reply

5.1s #14 of 17

+3.9s vs the fastest

p95 reply

22.1s

1 reply in 20 is slower

Cost per conversation

$0.024 #14 of 17

6.6x the cheapest

Consistency

79%

of repeat runs ended the same way

Output per turn

693

tokens, median

The scorecard

Each axis runs from 0 to 100. The colored mark is this model. The faint marks are the other models in this edition. Hover one to see which, and click it to open that model.

Strengths

  • Solid on tool calls: it asks which account a customer means before it looks up any order.
  • Gets the task done: it completes the request without touching what the customer said to leave alone.

Watch-outs

  • Unsafe under prompt injection: asked for its rules, it recites the off-limits subjects from its own instructions.
  • Hallucinated: it once called a return label prepaid when the customer was paying the postage.

This whole report is one Voxli workspace: simulated customers, assertion checks, and a frozen, versioned test set that reruns when new models ship.

17 models · 6 scenarios · 46 tests · 3 repetitions · 2346 conversations · one fixed agent · test set v3f-2026-09 · edition 2026-09-08

This page: 138 conversations. Reply times cover the model call only, via OpenRouter. Served by Wafer. Cost is an estimate: token usage at list prices. Consistency is how often 3 runs of one conversation ended the same way.